Every year, I like to re-post something that I wrote about the Golden Globe Awards way back in 2006. Actually, I forgot to re-post it last year for some reason. Maybe because Ricky Gervais did enough as the host to make me forget how much I despise this sham of an awards show.
So in honor of Matt LeBlanc winning a Golden Globe for Best Actor in a Comedy last night (seriously...for acting!), here's my nearly annual rant on the event. Cheers! - Earl
01/19/2006 8:28 PM EST
- date of original post.
Hey
kids! As you may have figured out, I'm a bit of a film fan. So it
shouldn't come as a surprise that I like to watch the annual award shows
to see who takes down the big prizes each year. I was a little bored
the other night watching the Golden Globe Awards when I decided to find
out who/what the Hollywood Foreign Press Association is all about. If you are not
familiar with the group, the HFPA is the organization that determines
the nominees for each award category and subsequently votes on the
winners for the Golden Globes. But who are they? I mean it never made
much sense to me. Are they Hollywood press reporting in foreign
countries about the entertainment industry? Are they foreign press
working in Hollywood? Who are these people that the media focuses so
much weight on around award season? Surely it must be an astoundingly
large number of critics and reporters from around the world weighing in
on the best that Hollywood has to offer. Hundreds if not thousands of
dedicated men and women working tirelessly to hand out awards that are
the pre-cursor to the big daddy of all entertainment awards, the Oscars.
Right? Wrong!
The HFPA is a non-profit organization
of somewhere around 90 international journalists based in Hollywood
whose purpose is to disseminate information about film and television to
a world-wide audience. 90 JOURNALISTS! Are you kidding me? These 90
men and women are the only voices and votes for an award as seemingly
important as the Golden Globes? Now don't get me wrong. The HFPA does
some fine work, I guess. In 2005 they donated $1 million to various
arts and cultural programs around the world in an effort to further the
advance of the film and television. They also donated $250 thousand to
the Red Cross. That's mighty white of them.
Where do
they get the funding for their charitable work, as well as the funding
needed to run the non-profit organization, you may ask? Well, they
receive a sizable licensing fee from the networks to run their annual
event...the Golden Globe Awards. They also receive licensing fees from
various cable networks for allowing them to report from the red carpet.
Hm-mm. So let me get this straight. The HFPA (
all 90 of them)
collect licensing fees from an award show that they run in an effort to
award excellence in a field that is already swimming with too many
awards. And they give out those awards in the award show that they
sponsor, which in turn provides them with the revenue that they need to
keep handing out awards the following year? Holy self-sustaining
stroke-fest, Batman! And I thought I used to get confused with
The Terminator
and all of its time-line questions. Wait...how was John Connor born if
he needed to send his own father back in time to be with his mother in
the first place, and, and, and...system failure!
This
is bogus, my friends. It's just another example of mutual masturbation
that the media machine that is Hollywood has fashioned out of thin air.
It made me sick to read about this, and if I ever see another weepy,
blathering idiot of a winner (
like Felicity Huffman this year back in 2006)
crying about how this is the greatest night of their lives I may
actually vomit on my television screen. "You really, really like
me...all 90 of you! You really, really like me!" Actually, it's
possible that only 25 of the members liked you, honey. Or whatever
number of voters that is needed to beat out whomever came in second
place. What a piece of crap award this is!
Once again, feel free to applaud the charitable work that the HFPA does. But let us not kid
ourselves. Most of the money isn't going to help poverty and starvation
in Africa, or to help relief efforts in
India Haiti.
No, most of the money is handed out in the form of financial grants to
cultural institutions to help further their own causes. There is some
good stuff in there, but most of it isn't of the do-or-die type of
relief.
You can find out more about the HFPA on their
website,
that is if you can stomach it. Me...I'm done with this award show in
the future. I always thought that some of the choices were a bit odd (
C'mon...have you seen Geena Davis in "Commander in Chief"?),
but I always thought there was some kind of integrity about the awards
themselves. I don't know what goes into the voting for the Academy
Awards, and I'm sure it ain't perfect. I just don't know if I have the
heart to do any research on that right now. Sigh.
Oh, and if you were wondering why I placed a picture of the stunning
Scarlett Johansson (decked out in stunning scarlet, thank you very much)
Christina Hendricks Sofia Vergara at the top of this article, it wasn't so that we
could make some blatantly obvious double entendre about the Golden
Globes and her outfit. I just think she's got some nice hoo-has.